Life-extension drugs Life-extension drugs

Nizoral scientific update

 

Int J Pharm. 2005 Mar 23;292(1-2):195-9. Epub 2005 Jan 20.
Staub I, Schapoval EE, Bergold AM.
Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Ciencias Farmaceuticas, UFRGS, Av. Ipiranga 2752 Porto Alegre CEP 90610-000, Brasil.

Microbiological assay of ketoconazole in shampoo.

Ketoconazole, an anti-fungal agent, is often incorporated in several pharmaceutical forms and in shampoo formulation it is known to be effective against fungal infection on the scalp. This paper describes a method to quantify ketoconazole in shampoo by comparing the cylinder plate assay and the HPLC method. The test organism used for the agar diffusion assay was Candida albicans ATCC 10231. Three different concentrations of ketoconazole were used for the diffusion assay. A mean zone diameter was obtained for each concentration. A standard curve was obtained by plotting the three values derived from the zone diameters. A prospective validation of the method showed that the method was linear (r=0.9982), precise (R.S.D.=2.57%) and accurate. The results obtained by the two methods were statistically evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the results obtained indicate that there is no significant difference between these two methods.


Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2005 Mar;45(1):5-8.
Kazy Z, Puho E, Czeizel AE.
Foundation for the Community Control of Hereditary Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.

Population-based case-control study of oral ketoconazole treatment for birth outcomes.

ABSTRACT The objective of the study presented here was to check the effect of oral ketoconazole treatment on fetal development. Ketoconazole has been given a teratogenic classification of C by the US Food and Drug Administration, but human controlled epidemiological studies of the treatment's effects have not been reported. The occurrence of ketoconazole use in the second to third months of gestation was compared between cases with congenital abnormalities and their matched controls in the large population-based data set of the Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980-1996. Birth weight and gestational age were evaluated in control newborn infants born to mothers with or without ketoconazole treatment. The case group comprised 22 843 cases with congenital abnormalities, while the control group contained 38 151 newborn infants without any defects. Six infants (0.03%) and 12 controls (0.03%) had mothers who had received oral ketoconazole treatment (prevalence odds ratio: with 95% confidence interval: 0.8, 0.3-2.2). No group of infants with congenital abnormalities had mothers with a higher incidence of use of the drug. The mean gestational age was somewhat longer while birth weight was somewhat larger in controls with ketoconazole treated mothers. Our study failed to demonstrate a higher rate of congenital abnormalities in infants with mothers who had received oral ketoconazole treatment during pregnancy.


Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;59(3):346-54.
Chaikin P, Gillen MS, Malik M, Pentikis H, Rhodes GR, Roberts DJ.

Co-administration of ketoconazole with H-antagonists ebastine and loratadine in healthy subjects: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects.

Aims Two studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of coadministration of ketoconazole with two nonsedating antihistamines, ebastine and loratadine, on the QTc interval and on the pharmacokinetics of the antihistamines. Methods In both studies healthy male subjects (55 in one study and 62 in the other) were assigned to receive 5 days of antihistamine (ebastine 20 mg qd in one study, and loratadine 10 mg qd in the other) or placebo alone using a predetermined randomization schedule, followed by 8 days of concomitant ketoconazole 450 mg qd/antihistamine or ketoconazole 400 mg qd/placebo. Serial ECGs and blood sampling for drug analysis were performed at baseline and on study days 5 (at the end of monotherapy) and 13 (at the end of combination therapy). QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using the formula QTc = QT/RR(alpha) with special emphasis on individualized alpha values derived from each subject's own QT/RR relationship at baseline. Results No significant changes in QTc interval from baseline were observed after 5 days administration of ebastine, loratadine or placebo. Ketoconazole/placebo increased the mean QTc (95% CI) by 6.96 (3.31-10.62) ms in the ebastine study and by 7.52 (4.15-10.89) ms in the loratadine study. Mean QTc was statistically significantly increased during both ebastine/ketoconazole administration (12.21 ms; 7.39-17.03 ms) and loratadine/ketoconazole administration (10.68 ms; 6.15-15.21 ms) but these changes were not statistically significantly different from the increases seen with placebo/ketoconazole (6.96 ms; 3.31-10.62 ms), P = 0.08 ebastine study, (7.52 ms; 4.15-10.89 ms), P = 0.26 loratadine study). After the addition of ketoconazole, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for ebastine increased by 42.5 fold, and that of its metabolite carebastine by 1.4 fold. The mean AUC for loratadine increased by 4.5 fold and that of its metabolite desloratadine by 1.9 fold following administration of ketoconazole. No subjects were withdrawn because of ECG changes or drug-related adverse events. Conclusions Ketoconazole altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of both ebastine and loratadine although the effect was greater for the former drug. The coadministration of ebastine with ketoconazole resulted in a non significant mean increase of 5.25 ms (-0.65 to 11.15 ms) over ketoconazole with placebo (6.96 ms) while ketoconazole plus loratadine resulted in a nonsignificant mean increase of 3.16 ms (-2.73 to 8.68 ms) over ketoconazole plus placebo (7.52 ms). Changes in uncorrected QT intervals for both antihistamines were not statistically different from those observed with ketoconazole alone. The greater effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of ebastine was not accompanied by a correspondingly greater pharmacodynamic effect on cardiac repolarization.


J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):1947-52.
Scholz M, Jennrich R, Strum S, Brosman S, Johnson H, Lam R.
Prostate Oncology Specialists, Marina del Rey, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Long-term outcome for men with androgen independent prostate cancer treated with ketoconazole and hydrocortisone.

PURPOSE: The combination of high dose ketoconazole and hydrocortisone (HDK) is active against androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Median response times with HDK tend to be brief but a significant minority of AIPC patients benefit with extended responses. Well characterized response and survival information, especially in the cohort of patients who experience these longer, more durable, responses has not been previously reported. Characterization of this subgroup is of particular interest since men with long-term responses derive the greatest benefit from HDK therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 78 patients with AIPC treated with HDK between March 1991 and February 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline clinical and laboratory factors predictive of prolonged response and survival were identified. RESULTS: The median baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) before the initiation of HDK was 25.1. The number of patients with zero, 1 to 3, and more than 3 lesions on bone scan were 25, 35 and 18, respectively. Median and mean time to PSA progression was 6.7 and 14.5 months. Median and mean survival time was 38.0 and 42.4 months, respectively. Response time and survival were highly correlated (r = 0.799). A total of 34 (44%) men had a greater than 75% decrease in PSA. The median survival times in men with more vs less than a 75% decrease were 60 vs 24 months, respectively. In a Cox proportional hazard regression, prolonged survival was predicted by percent PSA decrease, extent of disease on bone scan and baseline PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Ketoconazole can induce prolonged responses, occasionally lasting for years. Long responses are more likely to occur in men initiating HDK earlier in the course of disease before the cancer burden becomes excessive.


Transplant Proc. 2005 Apr;37(3):1574-6.
Videla C, Vega J, Borja H.
Nephrology Department, G. Fricke Hospital, Vina del Mar, Chile.

Hepatotoxicity associated with cyclosporine monitoring using c(2) recommendations in adults renal recipients receiving ketoconazole.

Following the change, in the way we monitored cyclosporine (CsA) levels in January 2000 namely from C(0) to C(2) concentrations, in renal "de novo" allograft recipients, some patients treated with concomitant ketoconazole experienced liver toxicity, a complication that had not been previously seen with CsA monitoring using C(0). Therefore, we decided to compare the outcomes of patients transplanted using CsA levels monitored by C(0) (1998 to 1999) who also had simultaneous C(2) determinations (group A) with those of recipients transplanted after 2000 (group B). All received steroids, azathioprine, and CsA plus ketoconazole. Recipients were followed for at least a year after transplantation. Patients in group B showed higher CsA C(2) levels, AUC concentrations, and drug doses during the immediate postsurgical period, and at 2 weeks as well as 4 and 6 months posttransplantation. Six group B patients (26%) but no group A recipients displayed, severe liver toxicity characterized by jaundice, elevated liver enzymes, with negative serological tests for CMV, HVC, and HVB. There was a correlation between the GOT and the C(2) CsA levels; both normalized 15 to 55 days after CsA dose reduction. High C(2) CsA levels, which have been recommended when the drug is used alone in renal transplantation, cannot be used in patients taking ketoconazole, because C(2) neither represents nor correlates with AUC drug exposure. Thus high C(2) levels may produce liver toxicity.


Nizoral description...

 

My BasketMy Basket

Drug category:
Antifungals
Nizoral
Nizoral scientific update
Nizoral description
Our prices have been reduced dramatically - by 30%!!!


Product list

- ACARBOSE
- ACCUPRIL-ACCUPRO
- ACOMPLIA
- ACYCLOVIR
- ADALAT
- ADAMANTAN
- AMANTADINE
- AMARYL
- AMINOGUANIDINE
- AMITRIPTYLINE
- ARAVA
- AREDIA
- ARICEPT
- ARIMIDEX
- AUGMENTIN
- AVANDIA
- AVAPRO
- AVEMAR
- BEYOND CHELATION
- BROMOCRIPTINE
- CAMPRAL
- CAMPTO
- CASODEX
- CELEBREX
- CENTROPHENOXINE
- CIALIS
- CIPRO (CIPROBAY)
- CLOTRIMAZOLE
- COAXIL
- COENZYME Q10
- COVEREX
- COZAAR
- DEPAKOTE
- DEPO-MEDROL
- DEPRENYL
- DIFLUCAN
- DOXYCYCLINE
- E VITAMIN
- EFFEXOR GENERIC
- ELLAGIC ACID
- EVISTA
- FARESTON
- FAT BURNER
- FEMARA
- FISH OIL
- FLOMAX
- FOLIC ACID
- FOSAMAX
- GLUCOBAY
- IMIGRAN
- IODIDE (KJ)
- ISOPRINOSINE
- JUMEX
- LAMISIL
- LESCOL
- LEUZEA ROOT
- LEVITRA
- LIPITOR
- LIPOIC ACID
- LOTENSIN
- MACA VIBE
- MADOPAR
- MEGACE
- METFORMIN
- METOPROLOL
- METOPROLOL RETARD
- MEVACOR
- MILGAMMA
- MIRAPEXIN
- MOBIC
- MONOPRIL
- MOVALIS
- MUMIJO (MUMIO)
- NADH
- NEURONTIN
- NEXIUM
- NIZORAL
- NOOTROPYL
- NORVASC
- ORUNGAL
- OSELTAMIVIR
- PANTOCRIN
- PAXIL
- PIKAMILON
- PIRACETAM
- PLAVIX
- PREMARIN
- PROSCAR
- PUMPKINSEED OIL
- RED WINE EXTRACT
- RED WINE HIGH IN RESVERATROL
- REVALID
- REVALID CREAM
- REVALID HAIR TONIC
- REVALID SHAMPOO AND CONDITIONER
- RHODIOLA ROOT
- RHODIOLA TABLETS
- RIMANTADINE
- RISPERDAL
- SCHISANDRA
- SELEGILIN
- SELENIUM
- SEROQUEL
- SINEMET
- SPORANOX
- STABLON
- TAMIFLU
- TAMOXIFEN
- TAXOL
- TOPAMAX
- TRITICO
- VASOTEC
- VIAGRA
- VINPOCETINE
- VINPOTROPILE
- WELLBUTRIN
- XALATAN
- XANTHINOL
- XELODA
- XENICAL
- ZETIA
- ZINC (ZN)
- ZITHROMAX
- ZOCOR
- ZOFRAN
- ZOLADEX
- ZYPREXA
- ZYRTEC

eXTReMe Tracker