Tamiflu scientific update |
|
 |
|
Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Chik KW, Li CK, Chan PK, Shing MM, Lee V, Tam JS, Yuen PM.
Oseltamivir prophylaxis during the influenza season in a paediatric cancer centre: prospective observational study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of oseltamivir prophylaxis for immunocompromised patients. DESIGN: Prospective, non-blinded, non-controlled observational study. SETTING: A paediatric cancer centre, Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two patients, immunocompromised by chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation during an influenza season in 2001. INTERVENTION: Oral oseltamivir prophylaxis 75 mg/d for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Laboratory-confirmed influenza infection, symptoms of influenza, drug compliance, and any side-effects from oseltamivir treatment. Laboratory monitoring included virological surveillance for influenza A and B, blood counts, and renal and liver function tests. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 14.3 years (range, 6.3-23.4 years). Underlying conditions included malignancy (n=29) and other haematological diseases (n=3). No documented influenza infection according to serological tests was present throughout the study period. Five patients with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection did not have any influenza infection detected by rapid virological assay and viral culture. For 16% of patients, the main side-effect in the study was gastro-intestinal upset. CONCLUSIONS: Oral oseltamivir 75 mg once daily for 8 weeks may be useful in the prevention of influenza infection in patients immunocompromised by chemoradiotherapy; side-effects are few and acceptable.
Ingenix Epidemiology, Auburndale, MA 02466, USA.
Enger C, Nordstrom BL, Thakrar B, Sacks S, Rothman KJ.
Health outcomes among patients receiving oseltamivir.
PURPOSE: Oseltamivir was approved by the FDA for the treatment of influenza in 1999. The primary objective was to compare health outcomes among influenza patients who were treated with oseltamivir and those who were not. METHODS: The patient population included UnitedHealthcare members who received an influenza diagnosis during the 1999-2000 influenza season, divided into those who were dispensed oseltamivir on the same day (N = 3211) and those who were not dispensed oseltamivir (N = 19,985). Cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric and respiratory outcomes were assessed from medical claims for a 30-day period. RESULTS: The adjusted incidence rate ratio for major cardiac outcome was 0.56 (95%CI: 0.34-0.93) in those without a positive history of major cardiac disease, indicating that those in the oseltamivir group tended to be at lower risk of cardiac outcomes than those without oseltamivir. The adjusted incidence rate ratio for major neuropsychiatric outcome was 0.72 (95%CI: 0.53-0.97) in the negative history of neuropsychiatric disease stratum. The incidence rate ratios for respiratory events were more variable. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no increased risk of cardiac or neuropsychiatric outcomes among subjects with influenza who were treated with oseltamivir in comparison with those who were not.
Institute for Antiviral Research, Department of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Smee DF, Wandersee MK, Wong MH, Bailey KW, Sidwell RW.
Treatment of mannan-enhanced influenza B virus infections in mice with oseltamivir, ribavirin and viramidine.
Mannan, a polysaccharide preparation from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has previously been shown to enhance influenza virus replication in mice by inhibiting host defense collectins. The use of mannan in infections may serve to broaden the types of influenza viruses that can be studied in rodent infection models. When mannan was co-administered with influenza B/Sichuan/379/99 virus to mice, the animals died from the infection, whereas mice infected with only virus survived. Three types of influenza A (H1N1) and another influenza B (Hong Kong/330/01) virus infection were also enhanced by mannan, but not four types of influenza A (H3N2) viruses. Mannan was used at 0.16 or 0.5 mg/mouse for optimal disease-enhancing activity using influenza B/Sichuan/379/99 virus. Using this model, influenza B/Sichuan/379/99 infections were treated with oseltamivir, ribavirin or viramidine (the carboxamidine derivative of ribavirin). When oral gavage treatments started 4 h before virus and mannan challenge, oseltamivir was effective at 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg/day. Ribavirin was active at 20, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day. Viramidine was effective at 80 and 160 mg/kg/day but not at 40 mg/kg/day. Active drug doses improved lung consolidation scores and lung weights, with decreases in lung virus titres also noted. Arterial oxygen saturation values in treated groups were significantly better than those of the placebo group on days 7-11 of the infection. Oseltamivir (5 mg/kg/day) and ribavirin (40 mg/kg/day) were used alone and in combination to determine how late after infection they could be beneficially administered. Ribavirin alone was very effective (90-100% survival of mice) when treatments started as late as 3 days after infection. Forty percent survival was evident even when treatments started 4 days post-infection. Oseltamivir was active starting treatments 1 day after virus exposure, but lost considerable efficacy when treatments began after that time. The combination of ribavirin and oseltamivir appeared to be no better than ribavirin alone, due to the stronger beneficial effect of ribavirin in this model. The overall results demonstrate that mannan can be used to enhance certain non-lethal influenza virus infections sufficiently to allow antiviral studies.
Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Boston University, School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
White MR, Crouch E, van Eijk M, Hartshorn M, Pemberton L, Tornoe I, Holmskov U
Cooperative anti-influenza activities of respiratory innate immune proteins and neuraminidase inhibitor.
The surfactant collectins, surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and D), and scavenger receptor-rich glycoprotein 340 (gp340) inhibit influenza A virus (IAV) in the following order of potency: SP-D>gp340>SP-A. SP-D binds in a calcium-dependent manner to carbohydrate attachments on the viral hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). By contrast, gp340 and SP-A act like mucins in that they provide sialic acid ligands that bind to the viral HA. In this study, SP-D, SP-A, and gp340 showed cooperative antiviral interactions. These cooperative effects were most evident in viral aggregation but were also observed in at least some hemagglutination inhibition and viral neutralization assays. The mechanism of binding between gp340 and SP-D was further characterized using monoclonal antibodies. Although gp340 can bind to SP-D at a site distinct from the mannan-binding site, binding of gp340 to SP-D did not contribute to cooperative antiviral interactions. SP-D and mucin showed cooperative interactions, apparently dependent on NA inhibition by SP-D. The commercial NA inhibitor oseltamivir had a similar effect and also enhanced the neutralizing activity of SP-A and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Hence, oseltamivir collaborates with innate immune proteins in inhibiting the initial infection of epithelial cells.
Regulatory Institutions Network, Australian National University, 3rd Floor, Coombs Building Extension, cnr Garran and Fellows Roads, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Lokuge B, Drahos P, Neville W.
Pandemics, antiviral stockpiles and biosecurity in Australia: what about the generic option?
In view of the possibility of a human pandemic of avian influenza, a first-line strategy for many countries is stockpiling of antiviral neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir [Tamiflu] and zanamivir [Relenza]), which can reduce mortality, morbidity and influenza transmission. However, global supply of the antivirals is controlled by the European-based patent owners, Roche and GlaxoSmithKline. This prevents competition in the manufacturing and distribution of antivirals and has reduced global supply capacity and affordability. The Australian Government has acknowledged that, in the event of a pandemic, its own stockpile of antivirals will be limited and reserved for those on a confidential rationing list. Pharmacies are running out of stocks, limiting opportunities for individuals to secure supplies privately. Compulsory licensing provisions, permitted under domestic patent law, would allow Australian generic manufacturers to start producing antivirals locally or import them from generic producers at affordable prices. Australia also has an opportunity and a responsibility to promote compulsory licensing and generic antiviral production in the Asian region, to ensure our neighbours can establish pandemic stockpiles in a timely and affordable manner.
Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomics Research Center, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Risebrough NA, Bowles SK, Simor AE, McGeer A, Oh PI.
Economic evaluation of oseltamivir phosphate for postexposure prophylaxis of influenza in long-term care facilities.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of oseltamivir postexposure prophylaxis during influenza A outbreaks with that of amantadine postexposure prophylaxis or no postexposure prophylaxis in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis based on decision analytic model from a government-payer perspective. SETTING: A Canadian LTCF, with high staff vaccination, at the beginning of influenza season. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly, influenza-vaccinated patients living in a Canadian LTCF. MEASUREMENTS: Incremental costs (or savings) per influenza-like illness case avoided compared with usual care. RESULTS: From a government-payer perspective, this analysis showed that oseltamivir was a dominant strategy because it was associated with the fewest influenza-like illness cases, with cost savings of $1,249 per 100 patients in 2001 Canadian dollars compared with amantadine and $3,357 per 100 patients compared with no prophylaxis. Costs for amantadine dose calculation and hospitalization for adverse events contributed to amantadine being a more-expensive prophylaxis strategy than oseltamivir. Both prophylaxis strategies were more cost-effective than no prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Despite high influenza vaccination rates, influenza outbreaks continue to emerge in LTCFs, necessitating cost-effective measures to further limit the spread of influenza and related complications. Although amantadine has a lower acquisition cost than oseltamivir, it is associated with more adverse events, lower efficacy, and individualized dosing requirements, leading to higher overall costs and more influenza-like illness cases than oseltamivir. Therefore the use of oseltamivir postexposure prophylaxis is more cost-effective than the current standard of care with amantadine prophylaxis or no prophylaxis.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Johnston SL, Ferrero F, Garcia ML, Dutkowski R.
Oral oseltamivir improves pulmonary function and reduces exacerbation frequency for influenza-infected children with asthma.
BACKGROUND: Among asthmatic children, influenza is associated with increased hospitalizations. Although vaccination is safe and effective among asthmatic children, its protective efficacy varies and uptake rates can be low. In comparison, oseltamivir (Tamiflu) is effective against all influenza strains and can reduce the severity and duration of influenza among adults and children. This study determined the effects of oseltamivir among influenza-infected children with asthma. METHODS: Asthmatic children (6-12 years of age) were randomized to receive oseltamivir (2 mg/kg) or placebo twice daily, as a syrup. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to freedom from illness. Secondary endpoints included the area under the symptom score-hour curve, the proportion of patients with asthma exacerbations and changes in forced expiratory volume at 1 second during the dosing period. Analysis was performed for both the intent-to-treat infected (n = 179) and per protocol (n = 162) populations. RESULTS: The primary endpoint for this study was not met. Oseltamivir tended to reduce the time to freedom from illness in the intent-to-treat infected population (10.4 hours, 8%; P = 0.5420), the per protocol population (24.3 hours, 17%; P = 0.1607) and patients who started treatment <24 hours after symptom onset (39.8 hours, 25%; P = 0.0780). However, an improvement in pulmonary function was observed. The improvement in forced expiratory volume at 1 second was significantly greater among oseltamivir-treated patients (10.8% versus 4.7%; P = 0.0148). Oseltamivir-treated patients also experienced fewer asthma exacerbations up to day 7 (68% versus 51%; P = 0.031). Oseltamivir was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir is safe and well-tolerated among asthmatic children, may reduce symptom duration and helps improve lung function and reduce asthma exacerbations during influenza infection.
CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
McKimm-Breschkin JL.
Management of influenza virus infections with neuraminidase inhibitors: detection, incidence, and implications of drug resistance.
Although influenza vaccination remains the primary method for the prevention of influenza, efficacy may be limited by a poor match between the vaccine and circulating strains and the poor response of elderly patients. Hence, there is an important role for antiviral therapy in the management of influenza. While amantadine and rimantadine have been available for the treatment of influenza in some countries for several years, they are only effective against influenza A viruses, they can have neurological and gastrointestinal adverse effects, and resistant virus is rapidly generated. Neuraminidase inhibitors, a new class of drug, are potent and specific inhibitors of all strains of influenza virus, and they have minimal adverse effects. The greatest benefit is seen in those patients presenting <30 hours after development of influenza symptoms, those with severe symptoms or those in high-risk groups. In addition to treatment of the infection, both drugs are effective prophylactically and have been shown to limit spread of infection in close communities, such as families and in nursing homes. No resistant virus strains have been isolated from normal individuals treated with zanamivir. Resistant virus can be isolated from approximately 1% of adults and 5% of paediatric patients with influenza treated with oseltamivir. However, infectivity of mutant viruses is generally compromised. Governments spend millions of dollars on influenza vaccination campaigns; however, once influenza virus is circulating in the community, vaccination cannot limit the spread of disease. A greater promotion of the use of neuraminidase inhibitors for the treatment and prevention of influenza could have a significant impact on limiting its spread. This could result in saving millions of dollars, not only in direct costs associated with medical and hospital care, but also significant savings in indirect costs associated with the loss of productivity at work, school and home environments. For the benefit of all communities, there needs to be a greater awareness of the symptoms of influenza and the efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors in disease treatment.
Institute for Medical Outcome Research GmbH, Lorrach, Germany.
Sander B, Gyldmark M, Hayden FG, Morris J, Mueller E, Bergemann R.
Influenza treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors: cost-effectiveness and cost-utility in healthy adults in the United Kingdom.
We assessed the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of treating influenza with neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) from a health care payer's and societal perspective in the United Kingdom. A simulation model was developed to predict morbidity and mortality due to influenza and its specified complications, comparing neuraminidase inhibitors with usual care in an otherwise healthy adult population. Robustness of the results was tested by one-way and multiway as well as probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Treatment with either neuraminidase inhibitor results in reduced morbidity and faster return to normal activities. However, oseltamivir dominates zanamivir in cost-utility analysis due to its lower costs. Comparing oseltamivir with usual care, the costs are pound14.36 per day of normal activity gained and pound5,600 per quality-adjusted life-year gained from the healthcare payer perspective. Oseltamivir dominates usual care from the societal perspective. Treatment with oseltamivir is a cost-effective strategy for otherwise healthy adults in the UK from both the healthcare payer and societal perspective
Chand P, Bantia S, Kotian PL, El-Kattan Y, Lin TH, Babu YS.
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2190 Parkway Lake Drive, Birmingham, AL 35244, USA.
Comparison of the anti-influenza virus activity of cyclopentane derivatives with oseltamivir and zanamivir in vivo.
Cyclopentane derivatives, designated as BCX-1812, BCX-1827, BCX-1898, and BCX-1923, were tested in parallel with oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir for the in vivo activity in mice infected with A/Turkey/Mas/76 X A/Beijing/32/92 (H6N2) influenza virus. The compounds were tested orally and intranasally at different dose levels. BCX-1812, BCX-1827, and BCX-1923 showed more than 50% protection at 1mg/kg/day dose level on oral treatment. The intranasal treatment was 100% effective even at 0.01 mg/kg/day for all four compounds. On comparison with oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir, these four cyclopentane derivatives have shown equal or better efficacies. The synthesis of two new compounds, BCX-1898 and BCX-1923, is also described.
Health Council of the Netherlands, PO Box 16052, 2500 BB The Hague, the Netherlands.
Groeneveld K, van der Noordaa J.
Use of antiviral agents and other measures in an influenza pandemic.
The Dutch Ministry of Health asked the Health Council for advice on how to prepare for a possible influenza pandemic. In two advisory reports the Committee responsible indicated the measures that it believes would need to be taken if such a pandemic were to reach the Netherlands. During a pandemic, the Committee recommends that every resident of the Netherlands with influenza-like illness should be treated with neuraminidase inhibitors such as antiviral agents. This approach serves to mitigate the course of the disease, to reduce infectivity and to allow patients to build up immunity to the virus. Since up to 30% of the population could become ill, the Committee anticipates that a stock of five million courses of the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir is sufficient. If a pandemic were to occur at a time that the stock does not exceed the present 225,000 courses, the committee advises restricting treatment to three specified groups of patients. If the first few patients are traced shortly after they fall ill, the Committee recommends treatment of the patient and postexposure prophylaxis for his/her close contacts. The Committee does not advocate prophylaxis in general, but it can envisage prophylaxis for particular groups of patients or under particular circumstances. The Committee believes that in order to reduce rapid spread of the virus, schools should be closed and events where large numbers of people gather in a confined space should be cancelled. Because this recommendation would have major social and economic consequences, the Committee understands that its implication will depend on the anticipated severity and extent of the pandemic. The Committee regards vaccination against influenza as the best means of protecting the population. The development of a vaccine should be the absolute priority.
Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, Herts, UK
Ward P, Small I, Smith J, Suter P, Dutkowski R.
Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and its potential for use in the event of an influenza pandemic.
Recent cross species transmission of avian influenza has highlighted the threat of pandemic influenza. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) has been shown to be effective in the treatment and prevention of epidemic influenza infection in adults, adolescents and children (> or = 1 year). Although oseltamivir has not been approved for prophylactic use in children, it has been shown to be effective. Oseltamivir is also active against avian influenza virus strains. Evidence suggests that lower doses or shorter durations of treatment/chemoprophylaxis other than those approved may not be effective and may contribute to emergence of viral resistance. Safety data from dose ranging studies show that 5 day courses of 150 mg twice daily for treatment and 6 week courses of 75 mg twice daily for prophylaxis were as well tolerated as the approved dose regimens. The use of oseltamivir in a pandemic is influenced by the goals of the pandemic plan developed by the responsible Government and Health Authority. To optimize use of antiviral medications, processes will be needed to collect, collate and report outcome data from treated patients and/or from use for chemoprophylaxis of pandemic influenza during the first-wave outbreaks. If oseltamivir is included in a national or regional pandemic plan, stockpiling of the material, either in the form of capsules or the bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient will be necessary. In the absence of a stockpile, there is no guarantee that an adequate supply of oseltamivir will be available.
Tamiflu description...
|
|
Drug category:anti-avian drugs
 Tamiflu scientific update
|
|
My Basket